The wordpressmigrate community site will be down for maintenance from from Friday 4/6/2012 at 9am PST through Monday 4/9/2012 at 10am PST. As always, if you have questions, you can email us at wordpressmigrate@ck12.org
CK-12 February 2012 Newsletter
CK-12 is excited to announce that in February, we reached 1,000,000 books downloaded! The downloads include books of all titles and across many different formats: PDF, Kindle, iPad, NOOK and more. The momentum is definitely building as educational institutions and individual learners search for high-quality and open solutions to their content needs. Click here to read the full newsletter.
News Archive
- 09/20/2011 – CK-12 Executive Director Neeru Khosla featured in Teachinghistory.org
- 05/31/2011 – CK-12’s May 2011 Newsletter
- 04/29/2011 – CK-12’s April 2011 Newsletter
- 04/29/2011 – Download Human Biology: An Interdisciplinary Life Science Curriculum
- 04/01/2011 – Interactive educational mobile apps created by SageMilk
- 03/31/2011 – CK-12’s March 2011 Newsletter
- 03/07/2011 – CK-12, the presenting sponsor at California Charter Schools Conference
- 02/28/2011 – CK-12’s February 2011 Newsletter
- 01/31/2011 – CK-12’s January 2011 Newsletter
- 01/03/2011 – The “Living Book” Movement: Free Education For All
- 10/27/2010 – Tech Awards 2010 – 15 Innovations That Could Save The World (CK-12)
- 10/18/2010 – Neeru Khosla on STEM Education
- 09/21/2010 – NASA Teams With CK-12 Foundation on Physics FlexBook
- 08/25/2010 – CK-12 Foundation now offering FlexBook titles in ePub format for iPad use
- 07/31/2010 – $200 Textbook vs. Free. You Do the Math
- 05/06/2010 – Digital Textbooks Coming, Quickly and Surely
- 10/21/2009 – Digital Classrooms Take Flight
- 10/05/2009 – New System Upgrade to the CK-12 FlexBook Platform
- 09/06/2009 – Nonprofit CK-12 Seeks to put open-source ebooks into Grade Schools
- 08/31/2009 – CK-12 Co-Founder Murugan Pal at Wikimedia
- 08/14/2009 – Open-Source Textbooks a Mixed Bag in California
- 08/08/2009 – In a Digital Future, Textbooks are History
- 06/08/2009 – Governor launches digital textbook initiative in Calabasas
- 06/03/2009 – Free digital book plan costly, educators say
- 05/12/2009 – Senate approves software as an alternative to textbooks
- 05/08/2009 – California open source digital textbook plan faces barriers
- 04/28/2009 – CK-12 Foundation’s Neeru Khosla on Open Textbooks
- 03/06/2009 – An open source textbook is more than a book
- 03/04/2009 – Virginia releases the first open-source textbook for public review
- 03/02/2009 – Open Source Education
- 11/30/2008 – Stuck-in-the-Past VA Physics Texts Getting Online Jolt
- 09/10/2008 – The “FlexBook”
- 08/05/2008 – Murugan Pal of CK-12
- 07/08/2008 – CK-12 Presentations
- 07/01/2008 – Open Source Open Services – Emerging Technology Interest Group
- 04/01/2008 – Wikipedia Founder Proposes Support for Open Textbooks
- 03/09/2008 – Is Wal-Mart Actually ‘More Evil’ Than Google?
- 02/12/2008 – CK-12: Remix and Share Your Own Text Books as FlexBooks
- 01/17/2008 – Google Tech Talk
Introduction to CK-12 video
CK-12 January 2012 Newsletter
CK-12 and OER on the Rise in 2012
Happy New Year! 2012 promises to be a big year for CK-12 Foundation and the OER movement. Momentum has already begun to build. In a recent press release the state of Utah announced its intentions to develop and support open textbooks, with math and science titles based on CK-12 content. The Washington State Legislature is considering an OER bill. Recent testimony from Reuven Carlyle, State Representative of the 36th district, showcased CK-12 Foundation and the importance of our content in the OER movement. We are looking forward to continuing our role as a key player in the OER effort. Click here to read the full newsletter.
CK-12 Wolfram Algebra
CK-12 and Wolfram partner to enhance Algebra I
Download
Download the Entire Book:
Download the Individual Sections:
- Chapter 1: Equations and Functions
- 1.1 Variable Expressions (.cdf)
- 1.2 Order of Operations (.cdf)
- 1.3 Patterns and Equations (.cdf)
- 1.4 Equations and Inequalities
- 1.5 Functions as Rules and Tables (.cdf)
- 1.6 Functions as Graphs (.cdf)
- 1.7 Problem-Solving Plan (.cdf)
- 1.8 Problem-Solving Strategies: Make a Table and Look for a Pattern (.cdf)
- Chapter 2: Real Numbers
- 2.1 Integers and Rational Numbers (.cdf)
- 2.2 Addition of Rational Numbers (.cdf)
- 2.3 Subtraction of Rational Numbers (.cdf)
- 2.4 Multiplication of Rational Numbers (.cdf)
- 2.5 The Distributive Property (.cdf)
- 2.6 Division of Rational Numbers (.cdf)
- 2.7 Square Roots and Real Numbers (.cdf)
- 2.8 Problem-Solving Strategies: Guess and Check, Work Backward (.cdf)
- Chapter 3: Equations of Lines
- Chapter 4: Graphs of Equations and Functions
- 4.1 The Coordinate Plane (.cdf)
- 4.2 Graphs of Linear Equations (.cdf)
- 4.3 Graphing Using Intercepts (.cdf)
- 4.4 Slope and Rate of Change (.cdf)
- 4.5 Graphs Using Slope-Intercept Form (.cdf)
- 4.6 Direct Variation Models (.cdf)
- 4.7 Linear Function Graphs (.cdf)
- 4.8 Problem-Solving Strategies – Graphs (.cdf)
- Chapter 5: Writing Linear Equations
- 5.1 Linear Equations in Slope-Intercept Form (.cdf)
- 5.2 Linear Equations in Point-Slope Form (.cdf)
- 5.3 Linear Equations in Standard Form (.cdf)
- 5.4 Equations of Parallel and Perpendicular Lines (.cdf)
- 5.5 Fitting a Line to Data (.cdf)
- 5.6 Predicting with Linear Models (.cdf)
- 5.7 Problem Solving Strategies: Use a Linear Model (.cdf)
- Chapter 6: Linear Inequalities
- 6.1 Inequalities Using Addition and Subtraction (.cdf)
- 6.2 Inequalities Using Multiplication and Division (.cdf)
- 6.3 Multi-Step Inequalities (.cdf)
- 6.4 Compound Inequalities (.cdf)
- 6.5 Absolute Value Equations (.cdf)
- 6.6 Absolute Value Inequalities (.cdf)
- 6.7 Linear Inequalities in Two Variables (.cdf)
- Chapter 7: Solving Systems of Equations and Inequalities
- 7.1 Linear Systems by Graphing (.cdf)
- 7.2 Solving Linear Systems by Substitution (.cdf)
- 7.3 Solving Linear Systems by Elimination through Addition or Subtraction (.cdf)
- 7.4 Solving Systems of Equations by Multiplication (.cdf)
- 7.5 Special Types of Linear Systems (.cdf)
- 7.6 Systems of Linear Inequalities (.cdf)
- Chapter 8: Exponential Functions
- 8.1 Exponent Properties Involving Products (.cdf)
- 8.2 Exponent Properties Involving Quotients (.cdf)
- 8.3 Zero, Negative, and Fractional Exponents (.cdf)
- 8.4 Scientific Notation (.cdf)
- 8.5 Exponential Growth Functions (.cdf)
- 8.6 Exponential Decay Functions (.cdf)
- 8.7 Geometric Sequences and Exponential Functions (.cdf)
- 8.8 Problem-Solving Strategies (.cdf)
- Chapter 9: Polynomials
- 9.1 Addition and Subtraction of Polynomials (.cdf)
- 9.2 Multiplication of Polynomials (.cdf)
- 9.3 Special Products of Polynomials (.cdf)
- 9.4 Polynomial Equations in Factored Form (.cdf)
- 9.5 Factoring Quadratic Expressions (.cdf)
- 9.6 Factoring Special Products (.cdf)
- 9.7 Factoring Polynomials Completely (.cdf)
- Chapter 10: Quadratic Equations and Quadratic Functions
- 10.1 Graphs of Quadratic Functions (.cdf)
- 10.2 Quadratic Equations by Graphing (.cdf)
- 10.3 Quadratic Equations by Square Roots (.cdf)
- 10.4 Solving Quadratic Equations by Completing the Square (.cdf)
- 10.5 Solving Quadratic Equations by the Quadratic Formula (.cdf)
- 10.6 The Discriminant (.cdf)
- 10.7 Linear, Exponential and Quadratic Models (.cdf)
- Chapter 11: Algebra and Geometry Connections
- 11.1 Graphs of Square Root Functions (.cdf)
- 11.2 Radical Expressions (.cdf)
- 11.3 Radical Equations (.cdf)
- 11.4 The Pythagorean Theorem and Its Converse (.cdf)
- 11.5 Distance and Midpoint Formulas (.cdf)
- 11.6 Measures of Central Tendency and Dispersion (.cdf)
- 11.7 Stem-and-Leaf Plots and Histograms (.cdf)
- 11.8 Box-and-Whisker Plots (.cdf)
- Chapter 12: Rational Equations and Functions
- 12.1 Inverse Variation Models (.cdf)
- 12.2 Graphs of Rational Functions (.cdf)
- 12.3 Division of Polynomials (.cdf)
- 12.4 Rational Expressions (.cdf)
- 12.5 Multiplication and Division of Rational Expressions (.cdf)
- 12.6 Addition and Subtraction of Rational Expressions (.cdf)
- 12.7 Solutions of Rational Equations (.cdf)
- 12.8 Surveys and Samples (.cdf)
Flexmath Results
Summary
Responding to low and historically stagnant Algebra STAR scores, Leadership Public Schools (LPS) instituted an intervention program on their Hayward campus during the 2008 – 2009 academic year. The program targeted all 9th-grade students enrolled in Algebra, supporting them with a concurrent enrollment math intervention class. Equipped with 32 computer workstations, this support class featured a discovery-based curriculum which leveraged technology to both facilitate open-ended exploration while also creating precise mastery of essential algebraic mechanics. Though only partially developed at the time, the results of this approach exceeded even the most optimistic growth targets for this population, delivering gains on a scale never before achieved with struggling Algebra learners. Since that initial pilot, with support from the CK-12 Foundation (http://www.ck12.org/flexbook/), the FlexMath instructional program has been developed into a full beta release which was further piloted during the 2010-2011 academic year by LPS Richmond, Envision Public Schools, and even a middle school- Sierra Middle School in Riverside Unified School District. CST results in August of 2011 revealed each pilot produced consistent performance gains for targeted students at a levels that place these schools among the top 100 in the state for 9th-grade Algebra proficiency, and at the absolute top compared to demographically similar schools.
The Assessment
California’s end-of-year Algebra 1 standardized assessment, the “Algebra CST”, assesses students on the Algebra standards of Claifornia which are prescribed to be mastered. The exam is administered by the state to each enrolled student at the end of any Algebra course at a school which receives state funding. The exam divides students into five performance bands: “Advanced”, “Proficient”, “Basic”, “Below Basic”, and “Far Below Basic”. Students are considered to have passed the assessment if their score places them in the “Advanced” or “Proficient” performance bands. Normally, among all California’s 9th grade students, around 20% of students pass the exam. In a typical year, about 2% of 9th-graders will score “Advanced”, with an additional 18% scoring “Proficient”. While the scores of pilot schools have increased over the past year, it is worth noting that the overall passing rate on the Algebra CST has also been in the rise in recent years. Since 2007 the percent of California 9th-grade students passing (scoring “Proficient” or “Advanced”) the Algebra CST has trended upward at a rate of about 1% per year, reaching an all-time high of 23% in 2011.
Target Population
The students targeted for intensive support in each pilot were 9th-graders enrolled concurrently in Algebra. Sierra Middle School presents the solitary exception, where target students were 8th-graders taking Algebra. The goal of this intervention was to produce a solution to the intractable and destructive pattern of summative failure among the vast majority of California 9th-grade Algebra students. Consequently, with the exception of Sierra Middle School, the most informative cross-section of data will compare targeted students to other 9th-graders taking the Algebra 1 CST in California. Further insight might also be possible by examining students of similar background either economically, ethnically, or both. An examination of student results from schools in close proximity to the pilot schools could offer a reasonable demographic control, though such an examination would exclude factors like self-selection bias, teacher efficacy, school culture, etc. Since perfect control cannot be accomplished, the results in this report focus on longitudinal data at the pilot schools as well as a simple “apples-to-apples” comparison examining pilot 9th-graders enrolled in Algebra, contrasted with all California 9th-graders enrolled in Algebra. These students represent California’s most urgent academic crisis, as they linger just one year behind grade level, and at the doorway of educational enfranchisement, but they fail at extraordinary rates, with reverberations across their entire academic futures.
Initial Results- 2009
The initial pilot campus for the FlexMath program was LPS Hayward. The initial pilot year was 2009. The pilot followed a year of intensive staff development, which is a mitigating factor worth mentioning, so that background follows. In 2007 LPS Hayward had never seen even a single student achieve a score of “Advanced” on the Algebra CST. That year 13% of LPS Hayward 9th-graders scored “Proficient”, making their total passing rate 13%. Between the 2007 and 2008 CST results, LPS Hayward embarked on an intensive faculty-based intervention which included retention of excellent teachers and retraining focused both on pedagogy and classroom management. The result in 2008 was that LPS Hayward improved to 23% passing , while the California passing rate remained idle at 18% passing. This was the first year LPS had ever bested the state average, and also the first year LPS had students scoring “Advanced”, in that 3% (two total students) achieved this distinction. The jump from 13% in 2007 to 23% in 2008 represented a significant gain for LPS Hayward, but even at that, so depressed was the overall passing rate that intervention remained a top priority. As before, key staff was retained, but the next year’s intervention would be student-based. With a goal of improving the passing rate to 30%, and a few even expressing outside hopes of possibly approaching the 40% range, the FlexMath program was initiated. That year all students enrolled in Algebra were concurrently enrolled in an intervention class with technology as its centerpiece. In August of 2009 California published the CST results of this intervention. That year 25% of LPS Hayward 9th-grade students scored “Advanced”, with another 31% scoring proficient, for an overall passing rate of 56%. The gain from 13% passing in 2007, to 56% passing in 2009, with a full quarter of the population scoring “Advanced”, remained absolutely without precedent in this data segment, until it was duplicated in 2011 by new pilot schools. In 2009, among 9th-grade Algebra students, 79 other California high schools outperformed LPS Hayward, but none shared similar demographic characteristics, and none made the kind of achievement gains this passing rate represents. Among students scoring “Advanced”, only 20 other high schools in the state outpaced the 25% mark achieved by the students of LPS Hayward. Regarding demographic control, in this same year (2009) a comprehensive high school immediately across the street, drawing from and serving an identical student population, achieved a 3% Algebra passing rate.